SEOidiot - SEOidiots a UK SEO Consultant» Google Archives – SEOidiot – Blackhat SEO Blog

Paid Links – Who is safe?

SEOidiot — Fri, 14 May 2010 12:32:02 +0000

After having a discussion with Matt Davies and others on Twitter today it became clear that many SEO’s are now getting increasingly frustrated by the way large brands can buy links without care whereas smaller brands get toasted.

The sad truth is that if you are a large brand you can really do whatever you like to manipulate the index as Google have to include you.

Google cant remove large brands as the average searcher will not think
“Ahh I cant find brand X, they must have been doing something naughty”

They will think
“Where the hell is brand X? Google has gone really shit!”

Sure they will occasionally do a token penalty for a few days but that action is aimed at making us SEO’s think twice about doing paid.

Does it make me think twice?
No

Does it make me angry?
Yes

Shaun over at Hobo has posted a great blog post about why outing isn’t a great idea for us in SEO too

Who is to blame?

The sad reality is that unless we are working with a big brand we have to be more careful. The truth is though that the only people who are reporting and outing sites are other SEO’s and Google ignores us….

The only chance you have to get banned is if you manage to get a staff member of Google pissed off or you do enough really bad crap that an algo penalty gets tripped.

Carry on… Nothing to see here…

Not me Guv….

Post from: SEOidiot

Paid Links – Who is safe?

Building a distributed link network

SEOidiot — Sun, 02 May 2010 10:14:31 +0000

This post is going to be pretty unusual for me and may well annoy many people but its a lazy Sunday morning and following a few conversations I have had this week I thought I would explain the theory behind building a scalable and distributed link network.

Sound useful? OK well settle in this is going to be a long and rambling stream of thoughts

OK so before we start lets lay out why and what we are looking to achieve here. If you take a look at the link profiles of any competing set of sites its almost always obvious that if they compete on terms beyond the home page they will be doing this from some manipulation of the anchor text pointing at their internal pages.

To manipulate this internal anchor text you need to be able to control what text people use when linking into your site and this means we have to: -

A: Find places that allow us to control the anchor text
B: Buy links
C: Have lots of sites under our control

Now sites that allow us to control the anchor text are either hard to come by or easy for any search algo to discount.
Buying links is costly and frowned upon (Ohh grow up its Googles fault you have to do it so get on with it )
Having lots of sites under your control is obviously a better option (We will do the maths as we go to show you that)

So how would one go about building a network of sites that we can have under our control?

Funny you should ask, I will share how I would do it (Not that I do this sort of thing

GOLDEN RULE
We DO NOT want any of these sites to be traced back to us in any way either detectable by the search engines algo OR by the manual spam teams

We are going to be able to control everything about these sites from our central control panel.
We are going to utilise very cheap hosting
We are going to outsource the content creation

Lets get started
We will first need to create a database on our central server

We need this database as we are going to send all the content out to the remote sites in our network as each page is called on the remote server. This will allow us to have complete control over hundreds or thousands of sites without having to log in and out or maintain CMS’s across lots of remote hosting accounts.

Here are the fields youll need for each table
First the table that holds our content for the sites
content_tb
This is the table that will hold our content for each page on the site

SiteID
SiteURL
Pagename
Pagetitle
Pagemetadesc (optional)
Pageh1
PageHTML
Datecreated
Live (y/n)
RedirectionType
RedirectionDestination

site_db
This table holds our sites and allows us to know when each one is due for renewal and also what fake whois we used to reg them with (Come on grow up )

SiteID
SiteURL
RegDate
ExpDate
WhoisName
WhoisAd1
WhoisAd2
etc
HostingCo
Costpermonth
Paidby
ftphost
ftpuser
ftppass

links_db
SiteID
Textmatch
LinkReplace
Live (y/n)

templates_db
siteid
templateid
templatecontent

OK you get the idea here – we are creating a database that will hold all our remote site details and also act as a database of the content on these sites as well as the links we will insert into them.

So now what we need to do is to get some sites.
We can buy some if you like or we can register some. Bear in mind though that if we reg some then this will become a longer term plan than buying them.
If you are registering them then please also make sure you give fake info for the whois (ON EACH DOMAIN) we do not want all the network to be traced back to us via who owns the damn things. It is fine if you want to register using the same credit card as this isnt public information (Unless there is a court case one day but thats not going to happen again…)

We will also want to potentially vary the registrar we use but thats more for paranoia reasons than practicality.

So lets assume you now have a bunch of domains we can use and you have added their details to the database. NB The database will be held on our central control site (Dont make this the same as your main domain, some site that is anonymous is great – think of it like a fake shop front on a gang bosses hideout)

Now we need somewhere to host them. We are going to use very cheap hosting. This makes our cost base low but means we will have to be creative on how we serve the sites.

Heres a search for cheap hosting on G

Loads of companies with prices like £5 a year or £1 a month. Most of these will be fine for us.

The minimum requirement for us is that the hosting deal we buy for each must be capable of: -

PHP
.htaccess
FTP access
Ability to call a remote file by file_get_contents (we have other options but…)

Most hosts will allow that lot though.

Got that? OK we are ready to go!

On each remote site we will be uploading one index.php file and a .htaccess file.
The index.php file will be our ‘handler’ and will respond to and deal with every request the remote site gets. The .htaccess will give the index.php file the ability to do that.

The way the flow works is this: -
Visitor comes to someremotesite1234.com
They request someremotesite1234.com/about_our_company.html
The .htaccess steps in and tells the server that index.php handles all requests for pages on this site.
The index.php page takes the full url and passes the domain and page to the central content server on our secret domain.
It passes: -
someremotesite1234.com
about_our_company.html

Now the central site takes over and pulls from the central DB: -
The content for this page and passes it through the link functions on the central server that will parse the content and add any links we specify centrally for this page.
Its also checks and finds the template that we use for the someremotesite1234.com domain and puts the content into this template.

The central site then returns all this as a finished page to the remote site that serves the page to the user.

Phew – still here?
That may sound very confusing but it really isnt if you have been doing this type of thing for a while. Bear with me and we might have an opportunity later to learn in more detail, for now this is just an outline of the system anyway.

So you may have noticed that we passed the content for this page on the central server through some functions that added the links if we had any.

The way that works the total string of content we had for the page requested is passed to a function that looks in the links table and checks for any text that matches a record in there.

So on our example the about_our_company.html page may have a paragraph like: -

At Johnson Brothers we have been serving the Coventry area for nearly 30 years, providing excellent customer service for anyone looking for holiday insurance. Contact us today if you would like us to arrange a quote.

This gets passed to the links function and it looks to see if it has any matches
In the links table we have specified that if on this page we see “for holiday insurance. ” we replace it with

This allows us to control all the content AND all the links for these remote sites through one central site.

The template simply allows us to create the site templates and layouts on our central server and therefore always only upload one standard index.php file to any new sites we create.

All that happens with the templates is when the page is called it also calls the template which looks a little like: -

And then the template functions simply replace the tokens @@token@@ with the content from the DB (Sidebar is just a loop through all the pages we have for this domain)

This way we can have a unique template for every site (NOT JUST UNIQUE CSS FFS) and we can project all coding styles – so we can have sites that look like they are wordpress powered, sites that are table based, sites that are plain css.

OK so thats the real basics of how we serve the pages.

How do we get the content?
We outsource it of course, we pay for paraphrased content.
Its important to note that these sites arent intended to rank well on their own and we arent creating content for traffic reasons we are merely creating content for the purposes of having a real looking organic site that will get indexed and can provide us with a link.

So we might have sites that talk about hobbies, pets, holiday guides, fake engineering companies, fake organisations etc etc

We will link build to the network as well as we go from sites NOT in the network itself.

RULES
Do not create sites with the same whois
Do not create sites on the same host
Do not create sites too close to any other site
Unique template on each domain
Unique content on each page
Do not interlink (If you do know what you are doing)
Do NOT leave footprints

Footprints are any way in which the search teams or algo can tie your network together.
Don’t put the same analytics on each domain (If you add Google analytics to any of these I will personally come round and shake you)
Don’t re-use the same templates
Don’t add the same structure or footer info

Trust me once you have had several thousand sites burnt all at once by Googles spam team youll learn that lesson.

Don’t add lots of links to each site

Bear in mind that it probably costs you somewhere north of £40 to place a paid link with a site and often this level of links means you get something on a sidebar or footer or added in a way that is easy for the search engines to detect and kill.

If you control it all you get links in the BODY of the content on sites that arent likely to be found easily and shouldnt be able to be tied together easily by the search teams.

Its also worth noting that the cost of these links is approx: -
Hosting / Year = £7.50
Domain / Year = £7.00
Content / Site = £15.00
Updates and Mngmnt = £ 5.00

£34.50 ish total per site

I am thinking of arranging a chat session somewhere for this if anyone wants to learn it in more detail.

Happy spamming.

Post from: SEOidiot

Building a distributed link network

My Adsense Flat

SEOidiot — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 12:50:40 +0000

A few times recently I have mentioned that I am preparing to sell my ‘Adsense Flat’ to friends and people always seem surprisingly interested in what my ‘Adsense Flat’ actually is.

A few years ago it was possible to create a decent amount of money from Google Adsense adverts simply by automating the creation of websites and because it was automated you could work out ways to scale the whole thing.

How it all worked

Register lots of .info domain names

Regfly at the time had their ‘Super Fridays’ where you could buy domains in bulk via their API for just $0.99 a piece – we used to get between 2-500 each time

Shove them all on one or two VPS hosting accounts

They were in fact all served by a single index.php file on the box, we dynamically determined the requested domain and then served the cached content into a set theme

Create a system that goes and gets content from somewhere

It doesn’t matter how we got this content but it was pretty poor spider food at best if I am honest

Get it indexed

All sites in a batch were cross linked and just 1-3 inbound links from elsewhere would be enough to get the sites crawled and the majority indexed

Place Adsense on the sites

The clicks were tracked and any site that we sent enough traffic to got contacted for a direct relationship

Await the site being de-indexed

I used to track ‘burn rate’ as a KPI of how long the domain remained indexed for (My KPI was the time between full crawl and 75% de-index)

Then repeat this again and again using the keywords that worked well

Heres a post from 2007 showing some stats from one batch

Why it stopped working as well

Well Google decided that the lack of value in the sites they were allowing us to make was in fact more harmful than profitable so they embarked on a tirade of banning people for spurious reasons (I eventually reached account number 7 and Google still owe me £8.5k that they will never pay)

How much did people make and what did they use it for?

Here is where I am different, many people made good money. Here is a screenshot of one of my Adsense accounts from the time (NB its actually a scan of a printout I made and kept on my office wall for a while – That account is banned now like so many others….)

As you can see thats $9,000 in 30 days

Most people spent the money on better computers, cars, gadgets and in one memorable case a year long holiday across the globe

I however invested some of mine in a flat in the nearby coastal town of Cleveleys

Here is the listing from www.houseprices.co.uk showing what we paid for the flat (There is no mortgage on that property)

And here is a screenshot of where it is – handy for a paddle in some brown freezing water

Its a one bedroom flat and has a retired lady called Veronica sitting in it as our tennant.

The plan was always to use the capital from the sale of that flat to eventually clear our main house mortgage.

Veronica has taken up an offer now to move into one of the many many houses owned by my mother and father in law so we will be selling it slightly earlier than intended but that all depends on what interest we get in it when it goes on sale.

Here is the place she is moving to – they dont look much these places but its ideal for a retired lady, easy for the shops and always in demand

So thats really the story of my Adsense flat, I do miss the easy money where the script was the money maker.

I have moved to outsourced teams and affiliate nowadays, whilst that doesn’t mean that I need to work much harder it does mean you have to manage much more.

2010 I will be making more time to get back to generating cash away from the client work.

Post from: SEOidiot

My Adsense Flat

Making your Serps more useful in FFox

SEOidiot — Wed, 20 May 2009 10:11:16 +0000

Went to see a mate of mine yesterday and was aware of the fact that they didn’t have an easy way to see where a site ranked in Google so thought id post my quick way of keeping track

Result Counter

100 Results

To use these just drag them onto your shortcut bar in FFox
So it looks like the image below…

Then to use – do a Google search and click 100 results followed by the Result counter
You are just a CTRL+F away from finding your position then

Post from: SEOidiot

Making your Serps more useful in FFox

CrapHat SEO – Its your own fault Google

SEOidiot — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:39:36 +0000

Having just read Matts tweet below I felt the need to gripe a bit

First off…

Yes profile spam is bad in a school forum – nobody would disagree

But you have to put the reasons for the problem into perspective.

Yes there are a lot of wanker spammers out there, some people do things that perhaps they dont think through.

The reason they are doing them however is Google decided that .edu domains could be perceived as having higher trust.

So Google, you attracted the spammers to the school and they posted porn as it pays…

Stop bleating that you are the good guys, its as much your own fault.

Post from: SEOidiot

CrapHat SEO – Its your own fault Google

Syndk8 – Bidding on people now?

SEOidiot — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:39:09 +0000

Just been pointed out to me that Syndk8 – everyones favourite blackhat SEO forum – and a place I used to spend an awful lot of time and where I still moderate – appear to be bidding on SEO names.

And its not just me, Dave Naylor and Esrun get ads too

But they dont seem to be bidding on people like Earl himself, Perk, Irishwonder, Bompa, Dianne88, TheKaptain, Vsloathe and many of the other high profile members.

I assume that this is another attempt to sell the Autopligg tool (Im not a big fan of that)

If it is its odd they arent after phrases like: -

Link spamming

Odd but made me chuckle – see if you can find anyone else I have missed.

Post from: SEOidiot

Syndk8 – Bidding on people now?

Odd Twitter Searches

SEOidiot — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:51:53 +0000

Just noticed this tweet on twitter that seemed a little odd to me.

This tweet appeared saying “We wrote something new today…”
I think this is from the excellent wordpress to twitter plugin but I cant see any mention of them mentioning me on that site?

So I had a poke around and I am confused…

They dont seem to mention me anywhere, I thought perhaps it was a scraper being bold but I cant see that anywhere and if they had I would expect to see something here

So perhaps its just a way of attracting attention on twitter by mentioning sites that may appear in peoples searches in the hope of putting your site in front of peoples eyes.

If it is it seems odd that they would use my site

Post from: SEOidiot

Odd Twitter Searches

Google allows MFA’s again – Come get the Free cash!

SEOidiot — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:57:00 +0000

I miss the old days of creating made for Adsense sites then sitting back and watching the free money roll in. The reason most of us had to slow down from doing that was that Google started banning accounts for very soft reasons and taking all the money back.

But today they opened up a new way for us to get free cash…

Google have announced that they have opened up their Adsense for Domains to normal publishers

And now ill show you what I will be testing so you too can have some free Google cash…

One of the reasons why Google may have banned accounts in the past was that the traffic didnt have any referrer (so Google didnt know where it came from) or it took a spammy path to get to the ad page.

Now Google lets us chumps in their Adsense for domains programme we have some advantages again: -

They expect ‘undeveloped’ sites so we dont have to have anything other than a crappy holding page with reference to the domains subject
We dont have to create crappy MFA style content anymore
Many people reach parked domains through a simple type in method – thats where people type in something like “cheapcarinsurance.com” in the address bar rather than searching for it.
So we can ‘gather’ our traffic from any crappy source (spam spam spam) and then as long as we clean off the referrer we make it look like type in traffic

So heres the plan
Have a look through your domains or buy a new domain like iwantacheapmortgage.com
Put a parking message on the page that includes the line “i want a cheap mortgage”
Add Googles Adsense for Domains code.
Hope their targetting doesnt blow as much as it did
Send traffic from any spam you can through a page that ‘cleans’ it

I would also keep your CTR down to something low for a while as Parked domains will have a really low CTR – we will have to find the level that gets us in trouble..

Let me know how you get on but thanks to Google we are back in the Adsense easy money game..

Post from: SEOidiot

Google allows MFA’s again – Come get the Free cash!

Reasons why cachechecker didnt show any links

SEOidiot — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:04:45 +0000

Had an email (Hi Hugh!) and a few other people asking why their site didnt return any results on my cachechecker tool.

For those who arent aware cachechecker is a tool I made that allows you to check what places Google thinks your site is linking out to. So you can ensure they are all links you put there and arent the result of a hacking attempt or dodgy plugin etc.

Cachechecker works on all domain extensions

Top reasons why your site isnt returning and results: -

Your site isnt indexed
Check this by doing a site: search on google – eg In the google search box type site:domain.co.uk replacing domain.co.uk with your site.
This lists the pages google have indexed for your site and if there arent any thats a good reason why it wouldnt work.

You arent getting or allowing google to show the cache they have of your page.
Sometimes people add code to their site that they have now forgtten or the designer you used had views on this that they didnt tell you about.
Have a look at those site: results and look to see that you have the cache link like this

If you dont have it then in your browser try view > page source and look for this tag in the head section of the code

This piece of code tells Google etc not to show the cache of your page

There are some reasons why people might want to prevent caching of their pages by Google but most of them are rubbish in my opinion

If your still not getting any results then by all means ping me an email like Hugh did and ill look at your domain myself (paul@seoidiot.com)

Now go try out cachechecker and make sure you know who your links are voting for!

Post from: SEOidiot

Reasons why cachechecker didnt show any links

Moving your site, how Google handled mine

SEOidiot — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:42:06 +0000

Its been about two weeks since I moved across from the .com version of my site across to the .co.uk version.

I did what most of us would do and 301′d the site across, some tweaking needed but fairly basic stuff.

I know whenever you do a full site 301 there are a few days when watching Google work it through can be a stressful experience but they are doing a good job so far.

Time yet for a major fekk up but so far so good…

Have you had any problems doing something similar?

Moves can go wrong…

Post from: SEOidiot

Moving your site, how Google handled mine